Best Of
Re: Multiboxing - Cap at 2 - 6 Characters? - Can we please have clarification if this will be allowed?
as a multiboxer in EVE, I saw I like it a lot for many reasons, specially for running small tasks far away, scouting and pvp
Re: Multiboxing - Cap at 2 - 6 Characters? - Can we please have clarification if this will be allowed?
Fair enough. I think a healthy MMO world should be diverse and consist of all kinds of people and all kinds of play styles
If I thought this game was 'not for me' well I wouldn't have bought the Alpha 1 and I wouldn't take the time to read or post in the forums.
Really, the only person who know's if something is for you or not, is yourself.
I approve of this message....
Caww
1
Re: Multiboxing - Cap at 2 - 6 Characters? - Can we please have clarification if this will be allowed?
It wasn't fact, you stated an opinion.Just go play a solo game.
The anti social community is getting out of hand with their entitled stance on a MMO…
Let’s remind them what that actually means.
Find a solo game to ruin your self into oblivion.
Please stop trying to come here and showing your emo kid I gotta be alone downy inspirations.
Go play another game this ones not for you.
Excuse me? The quality of your response demonstrates actually why I prefer to solo. Lol, how about you don't try and tell me what I should and shouldn't do? Also I'm so sick of the closed minded crowd saying 'this games not for you.....' . The game is evolving and I have as much right as you to use the forums and express my viewpoint.
Also, I find you calling me an 'emo kid I gotta be alone downy inspirations' actually very offensive.
you have stated the very reason no one would want to play with you.
I’m sorry you’re fragile and take offense to facts being said.
By definition, opinions are not facts.
While i agree that people should never be offended by facts, it is perfectly valid for someone to judge you as not someone they wish to spend time with based on the opinions you share.
This isn't anything that should be held against those making that judgement. In fact, the world would likely be better off if more people accurately judged people they are better off not spending time with, and then proceeded to not spend time with them.
Noaani
2
Re: Skin free Server type
Enigmatic Sage wrote: »A skinless server...
There could hardly be a more accurate User than Sophisticus asking for this, according to his Avatar. (lol)
* hides *
i was trying to find a good picture then I remember hell raiser's uncle frank lol
Re: A P3 Petition
I've asked Vaknar and he said they're bots. Hope it gets resolved soon, cause we've gone from a ton of spam threads to a ton of spam IN threads.Yes.
Also, I've been seeing the content has been removed a lot. I'm starting to think it's an account called Unknown, and they're just randomly posting "This content has been removed." on threads...
Ludullu
2
Re: Alt characters effect on pseudo faction design
LMAO. That Unknown bot is getting hammered! Someone most have some strong uncontrolled feelings about this XD
Volgaris
2
Re: Alts shouldn't count towards a Guilds member count.
It would also work against you, since your alt will be automatically in the guild and you won't be able to spy inside or outside another guild.
That's what the second account is for
I'm joking, or am I?
The player can make that choice, regardless of the other thread topic. Join this alt to be a spy and play with enemies or the main guild to play with friends.
most people dont have 2 computers that can run ashes, or even 2 comptuers, plus you will have to pay a 2nd subscription even if you use one computer. most people wont pay 2 subs.
Depraved
1
PTR Update Notes - Friday, August 22, 2025
🚩 ***NDA REMINDER*** 🚩
Ongoing testing on the Private Test Realm (PTR) is currently under visual NDA - streaming, video recording, and screenshots of testing on the PTR are prohibited outside of designated NDA channels. Any violations of this policy will result in immediate suspension of your Intrepid Account.
PLEASE DO NOT SHARE ANYTHING VISUAL FROM THIS TEST
Ongoing testing on the Private Test Realm (PTR) is currently under visual NDA - streaming, video recording, and screenshots of testing on the PTR are prohibited outside of designated NDA channels. Any violations of this policy will result in immediate suspension of your Intrepid Account.
PLEASE DO NOT SHARE ANYTHING VISUAL FROM THIS TEST
KNOWN ISSUES
- Interacting with Processing Stations will cause a Crash to Desktop.
- This may also cause characters to be unusable for a short time. May require multiple attempts to login and select alts.
PTR UPDATE NOTES - FRIDAY, AUGUST 22, 2025
- Bonfire Trade Outpost Emberspring has been moved out from beneath the large boulder that recently fell from the heavens
- Right clicking on targets to bring up the menu is now an option you can turn on or off. This defaults to off, and this can be changed in Options under Gameplay -> Targeting -> "Open RMB Menu on targets when"
- Cooking - Meat and Filet recipes will now correctly yield the animal fat byproduct material
- Lumbermilling - Timber recipes will now correctly yield the woodchips byproduct material
- Lumbermilling - Board recipes will now correctly yield the sawdust byproduct material
- Metalworking - Ingot recipes will now correctly yield the slag byproduct material
- Stonemasonry - Stone Fragment recipes for Sandstone, Limestone, Slate and Mourning Slate will now correctly yield the gypsum powder byproduct material
- Equipment recipes should now all sell for the correct prices
- Individual Artisanship tool benches that only crafted one type of tool have been removed. Artisanship tools can be crafted at Carpentry and Weapon Smithing stations
- Rogue - Fixed a bug with poisons, that would cause poisons to have no effect after the first time they were used
- Set to Motion Quest - The Graveyard Golem step for this quest has been removed. Characters can now acquire the Stone Brick for this quest from an interact in the area
- The Megalithic Mage Quest - A new "Dig Site" has been added to complete the quest
- When in Bloom Quest - Characters that fail to complete the quest after the final objective can now return to complete it
- X Marks the Spot Quest - Characters that miss the option to complete this quest can now return to Zorrin Fenn to complete the quest
- Characters can no longer enter a Caravel ship deployment area with vehicles, while a Caravel is preparing to launch
- The Anvils map has been updated to be more correct
- Rivers and lakes in the Anvils no longer have gatherable or decorative plants at the bottom of them
- Several gaps in the terrain have been fixed, and areas that were too spikey have been smoothed
- Fixed several issues with NPC enemy pathing
- Gathering visuals for Copper have been updated, so the destruction visual better fits the size of what is being gathered
- Updated several icons for things in the Anvils and the Tropics
Mepps
4
Re: Alts shouldn't count towards a Guilds member count.
@Ludullu
This is not really true due to how movement works in Ashes. You can't magically TP all over the map, but you can have alts all over the place. And hardcore players with top gear can use those alts to prevent guilds from doing content or kill war enemies at crucial points in time, even if those enemies are far away from where the main character is. These hardcore players would've had to go corrupt to do this, if they couldn't be in their main guild. Or they'd take up a slot in it, or they'd need to wardec on their subguild as well - all of which would impact the power of the main guild.
In other words, your suggestion would directly support the snowballing of strong players.
This is an excellent point I didn't consider. I retract that I'm okay with them getting the guild tag and guild buffs, ect.
This could just be a "trusted individual" option for guild chat, where each member has a few people they can add into it, depending on their hierarchical position in the guild. I'd definitely support that kind of functionality. Even better if you can do this directly from your friendlist.
Like Friends of the Guild list or something. That could be accessed from your Friends list if you have those rights in the Guild schema. Probably the better solution here that allows communication with out compromising the value of Guild member ship.
This is not really true due to how movement works in Ashes. You can't magically TP all over the map, but you can have alts all over the place. And hardcore players with top gear can use those alts to prevent guilds from doing content or kill war enemies at crucial points in time, even if those enemies are far away from where the main character is. These hardcore players would've had to go corrupt to do this, if they couldn't be in their main guild. Or they'd take up a slot in it, or they'd need to wardec on their subguild as well - all of which would impact the power of the main guild.
In other words, your suggestion would directly support the snowballing of strong players.
This is an excellent point I didn't consider. I retract that I'm okay with them getting the guild tag and guild buffs, ect.
This could just be a "trusted individual" option for guild chat, where each member has a few people they can add into it, depending on their hierarchical position in the guild. I'd definitely support that kind of functionality. Even better if you can do this directly from your friendlist.
Like Friends of the Guild list or something. That could be accessed from your Friends list if you have those rights in the Guild schema. Probably the better solution here that allows communication with out compromising the value of Guild member ship.
Volgaris
1
Re: Alts shouldn't count towards a Guilds member count.
It would also work against you, since your alt will be automatically in the guild and you won't be able to spy inside or outside another guild.
Depraved
1