Greetings, glorious testers!
Check out Alpha Two Announcements here to see the latest news on Alpha Two.
Check out general Announcements here to see the latest news on Ashes of Creation & Intrepid Studios.
To get the quickest updates regarding Alpha Two, connect your Discord and Intrepid accounts here.
Check out Alpha Two Announcements here to see the latest news on Alpha Two.
Check out general Announcements here to see the latest news on Ashes of Creation & Intrepid Studios.
To get the quickest updates regarding Alpha Two, connect your Discord and Intrepid accounts here.
Comments
If people want to look good so be it.
My only gripe with MTX is that I can't evaluate the player visually. If this isn't happening due to different appearances I couldn't care less if someone buys a gold noble robe or something for money.
I have no trouble if some high-end gameplay features are not accessible to casuals. This - makes sense. You play more -> you are more powerful.
Flying mounts seem to be super-high-end 1% server exclusive things, so it's not like it matters. Let those 1% have their fun with them for all I care.
AFAIK, they are not doing that.
Also, I think that in large siedges you will be rendered to other people with a default character skin that has no cosmetics or even your real armor. Just some generic class-based armor. So basically all mages will be rendered the same.
You are working off of the assumption that if there were no cash shop - then the company would still produce the same amount of content, but make it earnable for free inside of their game.
Which is not the case at all.
90% of shop-exclusive cosmerics would simply never have been made. In fanct, less in-game cosmetics would also be made.
Let's assume that the company makes 100 item skins a year, and 50 of them are shop-exclusive vanity items.
It is incorrect to assume that without shop they would make the same 100 skins, but put them in the game.
It is also a stretch to assume that they would have made even 50 in-game cosmetics. They would probably make 40, simply because of how much less profitable the game becomes.
less profit -> more resources needs to be put on real features like new content, and less is left for vanity items or even cool-loking combat gear.
Not having a shop does not positively affect your in-game variety. Why would it? In fact, it has a slight negative effect.
Why is it hard to understand that if you want the car to be pink you pay extra? Are you getting a better car no are you paying to win no what are you doing ? You are getting a pink car. Wish I could just delete this whole thread
Why is it hard to understand that first you need to get a Lamborghini(car) and then you pay extra for a color.
I support cosmetic shop colors and other accessories, but against option to change Ford Fiesta for Lamborghini Appearance at Launch of the Game. No one is concerned about color.
I'd find it disingenuous if someone wouldn't look at existing games with their epic rare items and not act like their visuals isn't a big part of their appeal. "HOLY DAMN THIS DAGGER IS MADE OF DRAGONBONE AND GLOWS" "damn dude cool. here, i got the same one, i paid a whole 5 bucks for it."
I guess my solution would be to keep cash looks more mid tier? You can look middling cool, shortcutting your way to about the halfway of the game if you want to invest no further effort, but you don't just get to be the cool kid on the block because your cc sits loose.
That costs $25 and looks like a weird leather samurai(-ish) outfit.
Idk what you're trying to say lol.
I believe cosmetics are linked to gear slots, not overall looks
It was mentioned on the most recent stream. For example you can have cosmetics on gauntlets, and another on the helm. They didn't explicitly say the MTX cosmetics would work this way but considering some backer cosmetics are like this, I would assume that to be the case