caedwyn wrote: »
@LieutenantToast i can't thank you enough for making a poll, but Are we sure people cant multi-vote ? 😅
Bonus Dev Discussion - Multiboxing
What are your thoughts on allowing multiboxing, and why? If multiboxing is allowed, are there restrictions that you would prefer to be in place? How do you prevent false positives on enforcement for families and friends who play from the same home?
digitalwind wrote: »
My opinion is that Multiboxing IS NOT a Pay to Win feature. --now hear me out.
....okay, MB is TECHNICALLY p2w, but you know.....someone buying a 2nd subscription but is only able to play 1 account at a time or both on 2 different system without any automation software...doesn't really count as Intrepid SELLING TO WIN.
It is an important distinction to make that while yes MB is debatedly P2W, it is not here because Intrepid is not offering a feature they are Selling. People can buy a 2nd subscription sure, and then run two freeholds and reap the crafting benefits, but Intrepid Studious isn't selling it. It would be easy to have the same benefit for $50 in the shop, but that's not what's happened and what Intrepid wants. Instead people have found a creative solution which happens to be to throw cash at the game for more accounts but lets face it, AOC is not targeting the penniless High School teen crowd anyways. You gonna cry because someone else has $15 more than you every month?
As long as efforts are made to keep players from being combat capable on multiple accounts at the same time, through
1. One .exe open at a time
2. automation software banned.
I don't see any problem with this. Banning MB however, comes with a mountain of issues
And besides, even if they ban multiboxing people can just use a VPN..
WMC51 wrote: »
Hell, I say make second accounts cheaper so I can let my wife and kids play. 15 for first, 10 for second, 5 for each additional.