George_Black wrote: » I believe that if players want to spy on other guilds they can just leave their real guild, take their account elsewhere and do their spying. And come back later. I believe that if people want to play alts without socializing they should just say "Im doing something by myself today so I wont be available". It's not a big deal.
George_Black wrote: » The proposed design helps guilds with their available spots. If the account is tied to the guild, a member can swap from a high to a low character, from a tank to a dps, from whatever the need is, without worrying about not having room, about coming to the activity with a non guild character, potentially missing out on contributing or receiving and guild points.
George_Black wrote: » I dont understand this selfish behaviour. What do you think guilds are? Armor skins that complement your mood? "I wanna be able to play in many guilds". I dont get it.
George_Black wrote: » Anyways. None of this affects me on a personal level. Not one bit. Ill take my common sense and get out of this topic. Arguing against selfishness isnt hard anyway. I said all I had.
George_Black wrote: » I dont understand this selfish behaviour. What do you think guilds are?
Dygz wrote: » I thought he meant IF your alts are in guilds, they have to be in the same guild. Not that all of your alts must be in a guild.
bloodprophet wrote: » No the idea is IF you have an alt they WILL be in the same guild. You get no choice in the matter.
NiKr wrote: » In other words, you're limiting player choice while not providing any benefits with this change. What it would provide though is more toxicity in hardcore guilds. I can already see smth like "I see you have a crafting alt. Why are you not crafting stuff for free for the guild? Wtf man?!" or "I see you have a healer alt. Have you maxxed it out yet? We gonna need it for the next raid cause we already have enough of your main class. Go do it asap".
Mag7spy wrote: » STILL waiting for all these quotes sayings that the systems are designed and no other considering about them changing as they are final from Steven the one guy keeps saying without linking anything. Again if it goes back to the spying there you leave guild and spy on another guild, or you get friends or pay people off in the other guilds to spy for you. All of that will still be apart of the game.
Mag7spy wrote: » Of course i have my own experience leading guilds and working with them and i see the issue of alts taking up space in a guild as a big one there is limited space and those slots will fill up fast. I don't view guild as a fan group that you are in while doing nothing for the guild, hardly interacting with people and just there to get states honestly I think that is boring when you have no investment in the guild.
Mag7spy wrote: » The onyl reason to be jumping in multiple guilds is that you aren't even giving guilds the fair share of commitment to see how things are and going to jump ship instantly.
NiKr wrote: » Also, now that I think about it, having literally your entire account feed off of one guild's benefits (w/o taking up as much space in the guild too) while committing only "one amount" of your time is way fucking easier and casual than having 5 alts in 5 different guilds that all consider you a valuable-enough player that they don't kick you. The argument so far has been "you can't be in multiple guilds on different alts because you're trying to make use of all those benefits", while BISH you're the one who's reaping way more benefits than you deserve! This was a god damn casual bait post in disguise. I'm onto your dirty tricks!
Noaani wrote: » This interview point of view assumes that all guilds will be basically the same, or function basically the same. If my guild wants to start up 4 or 5 in game guilds, each with different perks, that's our prerogative. If I want to start up a guild where players can join up on alta in order to be for-hire mercenaries, that's my prerogative. You are looking at this from a one dimensional *this is what a guild us and does* perspective. That isnt Ashes.
bloodprophet wrote: » Dygz wrote: » I thought he meant IF your alts are in guilds, they have to be in the same guild. Not that all of your alts must be in a guild. No the idea is IF you have an alt they WILL be in the same guild. You get no choice in the matter.
Mag7spy wrote: » Also not a i hate alts thread, literarily a red herring as you didn't read my post. With the designs in the game a lot of things can be exploited, just like if you could be in multiple citizenships which you can't which is good. Being committed to a guild means you will help it grow, instead of having less commitment to any guild.
bloodprophet wrote: » Hard disagree. Players should not be forced into one guild. If guild cap is 50-300 depending on how they set their guild up forcing alts to be in the same guild would needlessly take up spots forcing people to decide if they want more people or make an alt.https://ashesofcreation.wiki/Guilds They also want espionage to be a thing and forcing people into a single guild destroys that as well. Such a weird I hate alts thread.
Dolyem wrote: » bloodprophet wrote: » Hard disagree. Players should not be forced into one guild. If guild cap is 50-300 depending on how they set their guild up forcing alts to be in the same guild would needlessly take up spots forcing people to decide if they want more people or make an alt.https://ashesofcreation.wiki/Guilds They also want espionage to be a thing and forcing people into a single guild destroys that as well. Such a weird I hate alts thread. What if your account counts as a single entity in a guild as opposed to counting the alts as additional members??
Dolyem wrote: » What if your account counts as a single entity in a guild as opposed to counting the alts as additional members??