Greetings, glorious testers!

Check out Alpha Two Announcements here to see the latest news on Alpha Two.
Check out general Announcements here to see the latest news on Ashes of Creation & Intrepid Studios.

To get the quickest updates regarding Alpha Two, connect your Discord and Intrepid accounts here.

Dev Discussion #24 - Overgearing

1567810

Comments

  • DygzDygz Member, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    [Question]
    "How do you intend to keep the community cemented from someone who just came into the game versus someone who's been in late game or endgame for weeks?"

    [Answer]
    "One of the great things about the Node System is that it really works from a new player acquisition standpoint, where these nodes tend to develop larger near the starting location areas around the world; and it brings these players back to those locations if they're citizens and want services within those cities. So, as new players enter the world they're going to actually be surrounded most likely by more population because people are coming back to those larger nodes.
    In addition, we have certain systems that will relate towards a mentorship program that upper level players are going to be able to benefit from partying with and or helping certain lower level players and getting them situated in the game."
    ---Steven

    "Part of the whole experience with Nodes is that there is no real endgame in that the world is constantly shifting every day. Month one is going to be really different from month two and that's for the Level 50s and for the Level 1s. So, that sense of 'what's new?' is going to be the case for any new player who comes. They're going to be able to participate in these systems, and make a difference, from day one.
    It's going to be a different MMO(RPG)."
    ---Jeffrey
  • DygzDygz Member, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    edited November 2020
    If gear is the driving force for the "endgame" of Ashes, the game will have failed - miserably.
    Gear grind is not one of the design pillars. Nodes are one of the design pillars.
    Sieges/Caravans/Nodes will be the driving force of Ashes late in the game, by design.

    The primary hook for Ashes is that the game is constantly updating as we construct and siege castles and new towns, cities and metropolises. That's what's driving the late game.
    If it's just another game with a focus on endgame gear grind, there's no point in playing.

    People who like to overgear will do so at every level of the game. Including max level. Sure.
  • NoaaniNoaani Member, Intrepid Pack, Alpha Two
    Dygz wrote: »
    If gear is the driving force for the "endgame" of Ashes, the game will have failed - miserably.
    Gear grind is not one of the design pillars. Nodes are one of the design pillars.
    Sieges/Caravans/Nodes will be the driving force of Ashes late in the game.

    The primary hook for Ashes is that the game is constantly updating as we construct and siege castles and new towns, cities and metropolises. That's what's driving the late game.
    If it's just another game with a focus on endgame gear grind, there's no point in playing.

    Gear may not be Intrepids intention for the driving force behind the game at the level cap, but it will be the motivation for many players.

    If there is no further upgrades for people to get, many people will simply stop logging in until there is (see WoW).

    In a world where there is that upgrade path, players with a penchant for killing others will take it. From there, when other players that want to kill you are constantly getting better gear, getting better gear yourself is a simple matter of survival.

    The node system absolutely is the driving force behind the game as a whole, but that doesn't mean it is for all players.
  • DygzDygz Member, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Gear will be a motivation for most players.
    I don't think I've made a claim about "all players".
  • VhaeyneVhaeyne Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Noaani wrote: »
    good themepark has the next raid zone ready to go live before players are completely finished with the previous ones.
    I have not seen it since TBC in WOW.
    Noaani wrote: »
    To be fair, few games pull this off, but I don't understand why WoW players ever put up with the rediculous time between content drops in that game. That game is by no means representitive of themepark MMO's.
    It is not just WOW. Every themepark I have played has been link this. I think the only Themeparks I have not raided in were Rift and EQ2.
    Noaani wrote: »
    Not that I am saying Ashes should be more themepark, just that this is not a valid criticism against themepark MMO's - it is a criticism against specific developers.

    Big true! Other than DDO and WOW:Classic/TBC. I don't know what it is like to have more than one raid be relevant at a time.
    TVMenSP.png
    If I had more time, I would write a shorter post.
  • VhaeyneVhaeyne Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Dygz wrote: »
    If gear is the driving force for the "endgame" of Ashes, the game will have failed - miserably.
    Gear grind is not one of the design pillars. Nodes are one of the design pillars.
    Sieges/Caravans/Nodes will be the driving force of Ashes late in the game, by design.

    The primary hook for Ashes is that the game is constantly updating as we construct and siege castles and new towns, cities and metropolises. That's what's driving the late game.
    If it's just another game with a focus on endgame gear grind, there's no point in playing.

    People who like to overgear will do so at every level of the game. Including max level. Sure.
    You are going to need gear and a strong economy for all of that to happen. You are just talking past me at this point. We agree on more than you think, I just don't think you understand the economic behind the design pillars.
    TVMenSP.png
    If I had more time, I would write a shorter post.
  • NoaaniNoaani Member, Intrepid Pack, Alpha Two
    Vhaeyne wrote: »
    [I think the only Themeparks I have not raided in were Rift and EQ2.
    You missed out.

    While Rift never impressed me with its raiding, EQ2 did.

    That game had encounters that were not defeated for entire content cycles, let alone made obsolete. With the way contested encounters worked in that game, I don't think a single player was ever able to say they had no more potential upgrades to try and get for the decade or so I played it.

    That wasn't just my guild, that was in the entire game.

    Fortunately, most of Intrepids senior staff worked on that game.
  • DygzDygz Member, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    People will want good gear at every level, including max level.
    Lots of people will also want a strong economy at every level.
    We don't agree more than I think.
    We agree more than you thought.
  • NagashNagash Member, Leader of Men, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Dygz wrote: »
    People will want good gear at every level, including max level.
    Lots of people will also want a strong economy at every level.
    We don't agree more than I think.
    We agree more than you thought.

    we all know late game its all about looks and trying to show off :D
    nJ0vUSm.gif

    The dead do not squabble as this land’s rulers do. The dead have no desires, petty jealousies or ambitions. A world of the dead is a world at peace
  • DygzDygz Member, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Nagash wrote: »
    we all know late game its all about looks and trying to show off :D
    Showing off is not the same as overgearing or even gearing.
    Lots of late-game showing off is fashion over function.
    Cosmetics are where it's at. And house decorating. And pet and mount collecting.
    And parties!!!!
  • LieutenantToastLieutenantToast Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Hiya friends! Thank you for taking the time to give us your thoughts on overgearing here <3 I'm going to go ahead and put together a summary of your top feedback for our team now, but please feel free to keep sharing more in this thread!
    community_management.gif
  • LieutenantToastLieutenantToast Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Heya! As I'm putting together a recap of our recent Dev Discussion now, I'm going to go ahead and merge this thread ("Overgearing is the endgame.", Change my mind.) into the main one so we can gather all your feedback on the topic in one place <3

    Thanks to all who added some additional context and thoughts in this thread as well!
    community_management.gif
  • SathragoSathrago Member, Alpha Two
    Good god! The big fish ate the little fish!
    8vf24h7y7lio.jpg
    Commissioned at https://fiverr.com/ravenjuu
  • NagashNagash Member, Leader of Men, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Dygz wrote: »
    Nagash wrote: »
    we all know late game its all about looks and trying to show off :D
    Showing off is not the same as overgearing or even gearing.
    Lots of late-game showing off is fashion over function.
    Cosmetics are where it's at. And house decorating. And pet and mount collecting.
    And parties!!!!

    hahaha very true ^^
    nJ0vUSm.gif

    The dead do not squabble as this land’s rulers do. The dead have no desires, petty jealousies or ambitions. A world of the dead is a world at peace
  • IMO overgearing is a terrible idea that not only trivializes early game PvE but also gives people a way to evade higher corruption penalties of killing low lvl players.
    6wtxguK.jpg
    Aren't we all sinners?
  • NoaaniNoaani Member, Intrepid Pack, Alpha Two
    Dygz wrote: »
    Nagash wrote: »
    we all know late game its all about looks and trying to show off :D
    Showing off is not the same as overgearing or even gearing.
    Lots of late-game showing off is fashion over function.
    Cosmetics are where it's at. And house decorating. And pet and mount collecting.
    And parties!!!!

    This is absolutely true for a portion of the playerbase.

    It is kind of like PvP vs PvE though, everyone wants to gear out to an extent, and everyone wants to decorate their house, character, mounts etc to an extent.

    The game needs to cater to both, and so will cater to both. There will be a form of gear based progression at the level cap, and this will be one of the key driving factors of the games economy (along with decorations, node construction and sieges).
  • SathragoSathrago Member, Alpha Two
    edited November 2020
    I think one key portion of this overgearing argument that has not been talked about too much is the resource cost associated.

    This applies at all levels of "overgearing" be it level restricted or not. You will have to upkeep powerful gear, and the lower your level the more durability loss you will be taking. This is just a fact of having less tools during the leveling process. If they can nail the rarity of powerful gear materials then overgearing, even at max level, will end up being used for special occasions rather than 100% of the time.

    I do not see people running around in their best in slot gear at all times, they will be choosing to have multiple sets for multiple activities according to importance.
    8vf24h7y7lio.jpg
    Commissioned at https://fiverr.com/ravenjuu
  • VhaeyneVhaeyne Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Sathrago wrote: »
    I think one key portion of this overgearing argument that has not been talked about too much is the resource cost associated.

    This applies at all levels of "overgearing" be it level restricted or not. You will have to upkeep powerful gear, and the lower your level the more durability loss you will be taking. This is just a fact of having less tools during the leveling process. If they can nail the rarity of powerful gear materials then overgearing, even at max level, will end up being used for special occasions rather than 100% of the time.

    I do not see people running around in their best in slot gear at all times, they will be choosing to have multiple sets for multiple activities according to importance.

    Dude I wont shut up about this. I am glad you get it.
    TVMenSP.png
    If I had more time, I would write a shorter post.
  • DygzDygz Member, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Noaani wrote: »
    It is kind of like PvP vs PvE though, everyone wants to gear out to an extent, and everyone wants to decorate their house, character, mounts etc to an extent.

    The game needs to cater to both, and so will cater to both. There will be a form of gear based progression at the level cap, and this will be one of the key driving factors of the games economy (along with decorations, node construction and sieges).
    Everyone is going to gear throughout the entire life of the game.
    People who like to overgear will overgear at every level.
    In Ashes, it's not something that is focused on in the late game just because it's pretty much the only thing left to do.


  • DygzDygz Member, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Sathrago wrote: »
    I do not see people running around in their best in slot gear at all times, they will be choosing to have multiple sets for multiple activities according to importance.
    "Best in slot" is likely to be very conditional in any case.
    In Ashes, there will be a variety of reasons to have multiple sets for multiple activities - resource cost is just one reason among many.

  • SathragoSathrago Member, Alpha Two
    Dygz wrote: »
    Sathrago wrote: »
    I do not see people running around in their best in slot gear at all times, they will be choosing to have multiple sets for multiple activities according to importance.
    "Best in slot" is likely to be very conditional in any case.
    In Ashes, there will be a variety of reasons to have multiple sets for multiple activities - resource cost is just one reason among many.

    Good point and agreed
    8vf24h7y7lio.jpg
    Commissioned at https://fiverr.com/ravenjuu
  • NynaeveNynaeve Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    There's so much nuance to this question it's hard to cover it all. If you look at games like DAOC, which imposed soft restrictions on twinking (items would con purple to you and you'd get almost no use out of them and would miss all the time - red you would get some benefit, etc, until it con'd orange-yellow,) I think this was a system that worked well to allow twinking but keep it reasonable. They also had BG's sectioned off by pretty narrowly defined level ranges, which further helped keep things relatively balanced.

    While many players are referencing WoW's heirloom system as 'broken' or a bad idea, WoW did not have a focus on world pvp, so these issues were pretty much confined to PVP arenas and maps. Also, the heirloom system in WoW did not launch at release or anywhere near release; it was really made for players who had played through multiple max level chars and wanted a way to expedite leveling, have an edge, and be really efficient (and spend some currency doing it.) It also saw an overhaul because with the original heirloom release, almost no one used them. How much is too much is a different conversation.

    In the end, I really liked DAOC's method of having items 'con' within a certain level range of you to be usable and get its full effects. I think it makes it easy to control as at max level, you're going to have all kinds of secondary abilities, set bonuses, procs that are going to likely be completely overpowered on anyone below max level - even if toned down. Diablo also does this somewhat well in that the same exact item may exist in a lower form, but the modifiers are adjusted so low that any benefits dynamically scale with level to avoid imbalances. There's a lot of ways to do it, and I think twinking characters is fun. If you get a rare sword drop and you're on a mage, you may want to make a twink char for them to use it on, but I also think some leveling should be required for this to happen or it becomes too easy.
  • Half Tilt GamerHalf Tilt Gamer Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Let's look at this from two standpoints; Max Level Character and Leveling/Twink Character.

    Max Level Character: Overgearing really shouldn't be feasible here in correlation with end game encounters. If a character with a full sheet of the best possible gear goes into the hardest content in the game, it should still be challenging otherwise it trivializes the content and points to a stat balancing issue.
    If that same Max Level Character fights lower level content then its innately going to be easier. Ofcourse, with the ability to trade, buy and sell with anyone, even a new player could happen across higher tier gear than they would otherwise obtain on their own so level requirements on gear need to be present.

    Leveling/Twink Character: This is the controversial one IMO.
    On one hand, if you're making an alt and want to invest some of your hard work to make a new character level faster with a bit more ease then I don't see an issue with that. I don't think there should be a level 1 character wearing level 50 gear but something with a power bonus of +5 levels or so should be plenty.
    On the other hand, without level bracketed PvP (WoW Battlegrounds) and a way to essentially stop earning experience then Twinking seems very temporary and shouldn't be a huge issue.

    Now I'm sure we can expect level requirements on gear so when I talk about +5 levels or so of stat advantage, I'm referring to the gap between Normal rarity and the rarest Rarity (Legendary?) of gear at any given level requirement.
    The other way I can see working around this would be to have percentage based stat bonuses on gear instead of flat stats meaning gear would scale more with character level and would allow for much looser restrictions on gear level requirements.
    Find me on Youtube and Twitch as Half Tilt Gamer!
  • akabearakabear Member, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    edited November 2020
    In BDO I was able to use my wealth in game and existing characters to grossly overgear my alts to power level them up. Whilst it was an accepted mechanic within game, and whilst I disagree with it, I did use it often.

    I could see this being exploited.

    I prefer bracketed capability but overlapping a little as I always thought level jump at the precise level change was a bit off.

    Please let's not have this:
    https://youtube.com/watch?v=-Tko7Q2MlMM
  • SeloSelo Member
    edited November 2020
    No twinking please. Atleast not for main char.
    Im not really a fan of gear not beeing BoA for the highest tier gear either.
    It just ruins the work put into getting it if you can just buy them.
    Dygz wrote: »
    If gear is the driving force for the "endgame" of Ashes, the game will have failed - miserably.
    .

    Wrong. Gear grind and character progression has been a fundamental thing in the history of mmorpgs.
    A reason GW2 lost most of its players is becouse the lack of gear and character progression.
    The more of it AoC has, the better.
    Affiliate Code:
    0dbea148-8cb8-4711-ba90-eb0864e93b5f
  • Selo wrote: »
    No twinking please. Atleast not for main char.
    Im not really a fan of gear not beeing BoA for the highest tier gear either.
    It just ruins the work put into getting it if you can just buy them.
    Dygz wrote: »
    If gear is the driving force for the "endgame" of Ashes, the game will have failed - miserably.
    .

    Wrong. Gear grind and character progression has been a fundamental thing in the history of mmorpgs.
    A reason GW2 lost most of its players is becouse the lack of gear and character progression.
    The more of it AoC has, the better.

    Meh. I don't get excited by gear. Items are just tools for me and raiding was way too much of a hassle to get a new screwdriver. I dream of a mmo with no level and gear/stats progression. But I'm weird. :p

    DAoC was my sweet spot in term of gear (I stopped when guild housing was introduced, so I can't say what it became after that). Star Wars Galaxies crafting dependant gear made it interesting too.
    Be bold. Be brave. Roll a Tulnar !
  • FliPFliP Member, Alpha Two
    There are positives and negatives.

    Someone first ever character should not be able to overgear as they did not earn any high-level gear to overgear with.
    As with alt characters or "twinks", it is nice to be able to equip higher level gear to breeze through the leveling process, as you already did it once on your main and should not have to repeat it over and over again.

    Either way, I am fine with or without 'overgearing' as it is not in any way gamebreaking.

    The only scenario which could be abused is if someone is using alts to circumvent negative karma penalties.
    EternalFliPSignature.png
    Eternal Guild
    ( Web | Discord )

  • FliP wrote: »
    There are positives and negatives.

    Someone first ever character should not be able to overgear as they did not earn any high-level gear to overgear with.
    As with alt characters or "twinks", it is nice to be able to equip higher level gear to breeze through the leveling process, as you already did it once on your main and should not have to repeat it over and over again.

    Either way, I am fine with or without 'overgearing' as it is not in any way gamebreaking.

    The only scenario which could be abused is if someone is using alts to circumvent negative karma penalties.

    One downside with twinking alts i could see is it trivializes group content.
    If a new player that wants to experiance the game with some challange and gets grouped up with twinked players in group content, it could diminish the experiance.
    Affiliate Code:
    0dbea148-8cb8-4711-ba90-eb0864e93b5f
  • VirtekVirtek Member, Phoenix Initiative, Royalty, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    I enjoy twinking, to a degree.
    TL;DR: As long as people can't grind lvl 50 content to supply the top-tier gear for their lvl 10, I'm ok with it.

    I've experienced PvP systems where people would lock their level, hunt for the absolute best gear for that certain level character, and attempt to kit everything out as well as possible. This has the feel of a professional fighter trying to improve as much as they can and fine-tune their weight to stay within a goal weight class. Professional gladiator. Much excite. YAY!

    If they can bring a lvl, 50 item and give it to their lvl 10....that's just cheesy and lame. There is zero possibility that someone with level-appropriate gear would stand a chance. No fun in that, I feel.
  • TurboXTurboX Member, Alpha Two
    Late to the party but its definitely interesting seeing different people's perspective. I'd be interested in seeing a cross reference poll that correlates people support/against twinking related to when they entered the MMO genre.

    For me, Everquest and Vanguard were flat out the two best MMO experiences in the 11 or so I've played in the last 21 years. Both of these had some available twink methods and also created true appreciation for equipment. Any more, every game is so exactly balanced off mathematical equations and boring stats etc that it is so hard to get excited about loot which is a huge draw for many MMO players including myself.

    If they can recapture the allure of early EQ with the relatively challenging access to gear, especially some of the rare truly transformational items then they will have a game i'll play for a long period of time. Especially in the early days of a game, I remember seeing low lvl alt's of the top end guild just rocking the most bad ass gear possible and it just cleared that drive and allure to want to strive for that.

    Definitely one of the top 5 experiences in 21 years of MMO playing was camping a Tranquil staff and Fungi Tunic in EQ back in Kunarak on my main which took me over 65 hours of gameplay and alot of luck. Once I got it a made a monk ult and had such a fun time doing things that I couldn't on my main leveling or being in groups and then all being so happy to have someone who had got that crazy gear.

    Vanguard another great example of keeping it abit more in control but working hard to become a crafter and then making optimal pieces that while level restricted some where still very noticeable differences in power range when you spent alot of money or time crafting the top end (orange) gear for each level range.

    It adds so much replayability, i'd spend days just working towards camping, crafting, or tracking down gear for my entire alt's leveling experience. Vanguard did it best as well as there still was PVE gear incentives that were better then twink options in the form of legendary quests that literally took 8-10 lvls worth of hard work and hard group content to finish but gave you awesome rewards that you kept for the next 10 levels. It was a great mix of working this legendary quest lines and having twink gear to supplement, was so great.

    21 years....and my fondest memories other then hardcore raiding challenges were the fun with alt's and being able to play with a family member or friend who was just starting the game and being able to help carry them etc.

    For me, if i want a game where everyone is equal and fair all capable of doing the same damage and having gear give minimal to no true power swings i'd play a MOBA. I want variability, I want uniqueness, I don't want equality just fairness. So sick of games that you change your entire gear set and you see a few % bump in output strictly due to stat increase. Give class specific ability improvements, give unique click abilities, give proc's.....EQ and VG to some extent did this SO well compared to all the games that maybe have the best "mathematicians" as develops but the games lack any soul. FFXIV perfect example....such an amazing game but gear is basically pointless, and worse even they scale EVERYTHING so if you do lower content you scale down. Its 100% "play it exactly the way THEY want you to play it, everyone is the same"....sure its easy to design around games that have no flexability or variance but man does it just suck the joy out of the game for me.

    The biggest trick is to control access to the gear, again back to EQ I remember being on CoM farming epic parts with a group of friends for our bud. A jade reaver dropped and I was there for 12 hours strictly trying to help out, the group knew I had just started a SK alt so they kindly gifted me the Jade Reaver even though it was something still at that point that many lvl 40-50 people wanted. I was so freaking tickled pink, i played way more then I was going to focusing on my SK twink that could finally do some awesome damage.

    We just need to try to get back to "fun" instead of being so damn concerned about every single chance of imbalance. Do the math in the background, put creative ideas to at least have the illusion of uniqueness (weapon that proc's 20% chance of 55 damage ability Vs. just slightly higher damage ratio). Really hoping AoC gets back to this type of design instead of thinking they can use a math equation to derive enjoyment....many of us are still going to gravitate towards figuring out the min-max & BiS options but lets get some creativity back in loot and flexibility as well as exclusivity. If i get a super rare item then damnit it should do more then just look pretty, i should see a noticeable difference.

    lastly....please be the first MMO to go back to a post max level progression system for power. EQ AA's were still one of the greatest things in MMO history even if they did introduce harder levels of entry in expansions for newer players. You can scale that eventually to address some but it just provided additional reason to play at max level and provide further opportunity to differentiate yourself from every other joe-blow. Give us a world that isn't designed from the ground up to all be cookie cutter people with identical power levels....again I can go play an MOBA for games that I want ONLY skill to truly matter. Let all my hard work, dedication, efficiency, relationships etc ultimate cultivate into part of my power level. I think its just a younger generation and entitlement thing where people think everyone should have everything.....

    Good luck, extremely challenging topic :) My ultimate suggestion is put a fairly lose band on level requirements that let for ballpark ~50% increase in power/capability if we are are playing the math game vs. people that are just flat out using gear they find on their first main character. Maybe throw in a few super extremely rare items as gear that has wider level ranges, so flaming sword of awesomeness that comes from outdoor raid boss for lvl 40's and is a rare drop etc may be usuable by lvl 20's instead of the normal lvl 30 requirement most gear has of -10 levels or something. That creates that "unicorn" item that not alot people can get but chase, drives big ticket economy items that people save for and chase etc.
Sign In or Register to comment.