Glorious Alpha Two Testers!

Phase I of Alpha Two testing will occur on weekends. Each weekend is scheduled to start on Fridays at 10 AM PT and end on Sundays at 10 PM PT. Find out more here.

Check out Alpha Two Announcements here to see the latest Alpha Two news and update notes.

Our quickest Alpha Two updates are in Discord. Testers with Alpha Two access can chat in Alpha Two channels by connecting your Discord and Intrepid accounts here.

NO ALTS!!

12357

Comments

  • InixiaInixia Member
    edited August 2020
    You know, I thought it was an interesting question, but this thread is starting to not be super productive either.
    Like I feel most people have formed an opinion at this point, and its constantly being bumped to the top because its controversial not because there's anything really evolving idea-wise. It doesn't help that there's a lot of kind of pushy takes about how 'only people who are in line with my opinion are any good at mmo's'.
    Its completely possible for players to land on either side of the issue and that does not reflect skill level, it just reflects a playstyle preference.
  • This seems like a very selfish post. I think alot of people don't focus on their name and "legacy" like you do. There is an mmo out there, or there was. I can't remember it's name though, where you can switch class. For me, leveling and building your char is what i like in mmo's. Which is also why i normaly first look at class and race in a mmo
  • TeamVASHTeamVASH Member, Alpha One, Adventurer, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Noaani wrote: »
    @EvelynChills

    I think you have perhaps only looked at the one aspect of this.

    The social and religious organizations in Ashes are a fairly key content component. They are something players will need to work at and work on, but they will have rewards.

    If there was a notion of players being able to swap out primary classes, these organizations would need to cater to all character types somewhat evenly, as they are not something you can just swap in and out of.

    Players would be upset if the game allowed them to change their primary class at will, but then forced them to hold on to their religion and social organizations without being able to swap between them easily - as the way the game is likely to be, there absolutely will be organizations that are better suited to a mage and others to a tank, and yet others to a rogue. The entire premise of the OP's post - which is that he wants to "Max out an Alt for every single class in the game so I can learn, understand and exploit each classes weaknesses in PvP" falls dead flat when you consider that the builds people will be using will include these social and religious organizations.

    Suddenly, in order to make all primary classes on all characters possible, you are talking about a fundamental redesign of a core content component.

    Again, I am not saying this isn't something that should be discussed - I am saying that any serious discussion about it really needs to factor that in. If that is not being considered, then the discussion is simply not serious.

    That really doesn't seem like an issue to me. Switching classes is the same as making an alt. You wouldn't have any religious connections when class switching. Everything would have to be pursued from scratch as if it was an alt. Easy :)
  • NoaaniNoaani Member, Intrepid Pack, Alpha Two
    edited August 2020
    TeamVASH wrote: »
    Noaani wrote: »
    @EvelynChills

    I think you have perhaps only looked at the one aspect of this.

    The social and religious organizations in Ashes are a fairly key content component. They are something players will need to work at and work on, but they will have rewards.

    If there was a notion of players being able to swap out primary classes, these organizations would need to cater to all character types somewhat evenly, as they are not something you can just swap in and out of.

    Players would be upset if the game allowed them to change their primary class at will, but then forced them to hold on to their religion and social organizations without being able to swap between them easily - as the way the game is likely to be, there absolutely will be organizations that are better suited to a mage and others to a tank, and yet others to a rogue. The entire premise of the OP's post - which is that he wants to "Max out an Alt for every single class in the game so I can learn, understand and exploit each classes weaknesses in PvP" falls dead flat when you consider that the builds people will be using will include these social and religious organizations.

    Suddenly, in order to make all primary classes on all characters possible, you are talking about a fundamental redesign of a core content component.

    Again, I am not saying this isn't something that should be discussed - I am saying that any serious discussion about it really needs to factor that in. If that is not being considered, then the discussion is simply not serious.

    That really doesn't seem like an issue to me. Switching classes is the same as making an alt. You wouldn't have any religious connections when class switching. Everything would have to be pursued from scratch as if it was an alt. Easy :)
    Organizations are character based, not class based.

    If - and that is a big if - Intrepid did allow primary class switching, organization standing would be tied to your character, not your class. It makes no sense at all to make it otherwise.

    This does mean that the notion of being able to switch between any build can't happen, but that seems to be by design - and by intent.
  • I personally can see the following pros and cons for having alts but I don't mind, I can adapt to both situations.

    Pros:
    - You can have multiple characters in different locations for different tasks.
    - You can have different races and looks for your characters.

    Cons:
    - Finding names for all of them.
    - Swapping gear between them can be a pain depending from their locations.
    - I think Alts are not bound to the same guild/position, I would prefer if this was account based (please correct me if I'm wrong).
  • If the ability to change classes is put into the game, you should also be reset to 0 experience.
    I don't see an issue with keeping equipment since most will not be bound, but if you start a new class, you should start at the start. No keeping your level or ability points.
  • TeamVASHTeamVASH Member, Alpha One, Adventurer, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Noaani wrote: »
    Organizations are character based, not class based.

    If - and that is a big if - Intrepid did allow primary class switching, organization standing would be tied to your character, not your class. It makes no sense at all to make it otherwise.

    This does mean that the notion of being able to switch between any build can't happen, but that seems to be by design - and by intent.

    It can be designed any way they like obviously. If they ended up seeing the value in what I'm proposing they can implement it any way they see fit. Having alt characters tied to one Creator name makes perfect sense. The name of a content creator is our entire brand and surprise surprise, it means a lot to us. And of course we all know how important it is to create a platform that supports the creators. Its a win win for everyone :)
  • NoaaniNoaani Member, Intrepid Pack, Alpha Two
    TeamVASH wrote: »
    The name of a content creator is our entire brand
    But is not a factor that a game should be designed around.

    Be a player, or a content creator.

    One or the other.

    If you are a player, then play as you want.

    If you are a content creator, stick to your brand.
  • QuarantineQuarantine Member, Leader of Men, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    It is fascinating how some content creators want the world to bend around them. You should make your content work around the game you are playing, not the other way around. I've been in situations where a content creator joins a guild, makes everyone watch their content, then complains that the game they are playing isn't good for their content. Pretty much don't see a point in catering to your type. Always will have a new complaint, and it's always about what's best for you.
  • skearnzskearnz Member, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    allright, so having a creator name that any1 can see would not be bad, but having everything on 1 char is not a good idea for ashes, other mmo's maybe.

    myself i have played FF14 for about 7k hours and being able to have every class on 1 character deff was a boon there. but ff14 was all about its narrative, pvp wasnt a good thing in there (because thay also partly dropped the ball with that)
    so being able to have everything on 1 character is a good idea for that game, but for ashes its about investment, agency, player markets and most importantly being dependent on others for their roles, for theirs specs and espionage.

    on top of that, social organizations, while available to all classes do have some definite benefits to certain classes (ex, thieves guild and rogues class) and you cant just step out of 1 to join the other, systems like these are why it would not be a good idea.

    "so why not design it differently then?"
    because this is stevens mmorpg, not yours, you dont get a say in this without the majority agreeing with you (and im not saying that you said so). this game is made with steven shariff at the helm, we players help him towards to make his mmorpg that we want to play because we love his goal for this game and agree to it.

    i will say it very plainly, this game might not be for you.
  • CM KalezCM Kalez Member, Intrepid Pack, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    edited August 2020
    TeamVash is a Liar, and toxic for the STW Community.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3qeRY97pAs

    just here with popcorn
    Kalez.png
  • skearnzskearnz Member, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    CM Patriot wrote: »
    TeamVash is a Liar, and toxic for the STW Community.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3qeRY97pAs

    just here with popcorn

    good to know, saves me the time from debating with a person like that, thank you very kindly patriot:)
  • bloodprophetbloodprophet Member, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    TeamVASH wrote: »
    Noaani wrote: »
    Organizations are character based, not class based.

    If - and that is a big if - Intrepid did allow primary class switching, organization standing would be tied to your character, not your class. It makes no sense at all to make it otherwise.

    This does mean that the notion of being able to switch between any build can't happen, but that seems to be by design - and by intent.

    It can be designed any way they like obviously. If they ended up seeing the value in what I'm proposing they can implement it any way they see fit. Having alt characters tied to one Creator name makes perfect sense. The name of a content creator is our entire brand and surprise surprise, it means a lot to us. And of course we all know how important it is to create a platform that supports the creators. Its a win win for everyone :)

    You were winning me over till you said this.
    "I'm a content creator and they need to cater towards me!!" Nonsense 99.9% of the players don't give a damn about your content. I had never even heard of you till you started posting here. Personally I hope there are no content creators on my server so we don't have to deal with them and their marry band of sycophants messing up the place.
    Most people never listen. They are just waiting on you to quit making noise so they can.
  • ZericZeric Member, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    The original post come off as entirely pretentious, self-serving, elitist, and manipulative.

    First we get the click-bait title in all caps paired with the standard more than 1 explanation point. Making it clear from the start, the following thread will not be for a discussion but a demand that you accept and support what will be said. No opposing opinion will be viable or accepted.

    Next we get an opening paragraph, where the very first sentence is meant to make you think this person is an understanding and reasonable person. Which is then immediately followed up by a strawman position and his declaration to show why the strawman is an inferior position to the poster's correct position.

    Following this up we get a wall of text. None of which, supports or is even in relation to the opening paragraph. The first two sentences are another opening paragraph. Where the discussion is changed from, why Ashes of Creation wants players locked into single classes, into, why name recognition and branding is important.

    While doing this, he tries to boost his credibility by declaring that he is an "insane hardcore player that maxes out an alt for every class." And he has a history of two years of unbeatable WoW PvP experience.

    Then we hit the second half of the wall of text; where he starts to show the true intent of his post. Which is a jumbled mess of complaints about how it is a terrible waste of time to be forced to play on "stupid alternate names...that no one knows." And how it makes it hard to have name recognition.

    Ending it off with a closing paragraph that has no connection to anything posted before it.

    After which, he edits in his response to "common Fears." Most of which can be boiled down to, no you are wrong and I am right, or my name recognition is more important.

    Then you get to see his signature, which is a massive advertisement for his "content creator" links.

    This entire original post is merely a whine post about, "why can't Ashes of Creation make it easier from me to grow my brand name and name recognition."
    All the while, ignoring there are many well know "content creators" that have alternative names across many different games that still get recognized.

    Manipulative, self-serving, and pretentious elitism like those presented in this tread piss me off like nothing else.
  • DygzDygz Member, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Ashes is an RPG.
    Which means players will be roleplaying different characters.
    When you change class, you change roles...which includes names.

    I'm an actor/singer/dancer, so...I always have alts. People do not have difficulty recognizing the alts I want them to be aware of. It's not unusual for people to refer to my alt by my player name.
    "Hey, look! Dygz is here!!"
    Dygz playing as Neela: "Oh cool! Wait! I don't see Dygz around? Did he go Invisible??!!"

    If you want your alts to be instantly recognizable by other gamers - just use some variation of a known name in the names of all your alts.
  • NoaaniNoaani Member, Intrepid Pack, Alpha Two
    CM Patriot wrote: »
    TeamVash is a Liar, and toxic for the STW Community.
    One thing I will say about his argument, combat trackers are a good idea.

    Combat trackers are the best way to combat lying content creators. They say a thing, someone uses objective facts to prove them wrong - enough of that cycle and the content creator loses their audience.
  • TeamVASHTeamVASH Member, Alpha One, Adventurer, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Zeric wrote: »
    The original post come off as entirely pretentious, self-serving, elitist, and manipulative.

    First we get the click-bait title in all caps paired with the standard more than 1 explanation point. Making it clear from the start, the following thread will not be for a discussion but a demand that you accept and support what will be said. No opposing opinion will be viable or accepted.

    Next we get an opening paragraph, where the very first sentence is meant to make you think this person is an understanding and reasonable person. Which is then immediately followed up by a strawman position and his declaration to show why the strawman is an inferior position to the poster's correct position.

    Following this up we get a wall of text. None of which, supports or is even in relation to the opening paragraph. The first two sentences are another opening paragraph. Where the discussion is changed from, why Ashes of Creation wants players locked into single classes, into, why name recognition and branding is important.

    While doing this, he tries to boost his credibility by declaring that he is an "insane hardcore player that maxes out an alt for every class." And he has a history of two years of unbeatable WoW PvP experience.

    Then we hit the second half of the wall of text; where he starts to show the true intent of his post. Which is a jumbled mess of complaints about how it is a terrible waste of time to be forced to play on "stupid alternate names...that no one knows." And how it makes it hard to have name recognition.

    Ending it off with a closing paragraph that has no connection to anything posted before it.

    After which, he edits in his response to "common Fears." Most of which can be boiled down to, no you are wrong and I am right, or my name recognition is more important.

    Then you get to see his signature, which is a massive advertisement for his "content creator" links.

    This entire original post is merely a whine post about, "why can't Ashes of Creation make it easier from me to grow my brand name and name recognition."
    All the while, ignoring there are many well know "content creators" that have alternative names across many different games that still get recognized.

    Manipulative, self-serving, and pretentious elitism like those presented in this tread piss me off like nothing else.

    Actually I just want my name. Roleplay has been a massive part of my life and my name is what I want. Plain and simple. I don't know what you are on about with this crazy rant. I just want a persistent name. I've wanted it since way before I became a content creator :smile:
  • NoaaniNoaani Member, Intrepid Pack, Alpha Two
    edited September 2020
    TeamVASH wrote: »
    I just want a persistent name.
    If your name is the only thing about you people recognize, you should work on getting a better personality.

    If I started posting on these forums with a different account, it would take maybe three or four posts before people realize it is me.

    People may like how I post, or they may not. They may agree with what I have to say, or they may not. One thing that is certian though, is that people will know a post is from me if they read it.

    Your argument in regards to a content creator was a better argument than wanting a system built in to the game to overcome your lack of personality.
  • TeamVASHTeamVASH Member, Alpha One, Adventurer, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Noaani wrote: »
    TeamVASH wrote: »
    I just want a persistent name.
    If your name is the only thing about you people recognize, you should work on getting a better personality.

    If I started posting on these forums with a different account, it would take maybe three or four posts before people realize it is me.

    People may like how I post, or they may not. They may agree with what I have to say, or they may not. One thing that is certian though, is that people will know a post is from me if they read it.

    Your argument in regards to a content creator was a better argument than wanting a system built in to the game to overcome your lack of personality.

    I don't know why you feel the need to spew toxicity and hate for no reason at all to someone you don't know anything about. That's pretty insane sir but if that's what makes you happy you do you lol
  • NoaaniNoaani Member, Intrepid Pack, Alpha Two
    TeamVASH wrote: »
    Noaani wrote: »
    TeamVASH wrote: »
    I just want a persistent name.
    If your name is the only thing about you people recognize, you should work on getting a better personality.

    If I started posting on these forums with a different account, it would take maybe three or four posts before people realize it is me.

    People may like how I post, or they may not. They may agree with what I have to say, or they may not. One thing that is certian though, is that people will know a post is from me if they read it.

    Your argument in regards to a content creator was a better argument than wanting a system built in to the game to overcome your lack of personality.

    I don't know why you feel the need to spew toxicity and hate for no reason at all to someone you don't know anything about. That's pretty insane sir but if that's what makes you happy you do you lol

    Not really hate, nor toxic.

    Literally all I am saying it what I said - people don't need to see my forum handle to know a post is from me - like it or not. Why do they need to see your name to know you are you?

    Rather than trying to change the game, wouldn't you be better off working on that?

    This is especially true if you are a streamer - be a person that people recognize without needing the name attached.
  • VolgaireVolgaire Member, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    This seems...silly.
  • NoaaniNoaani Member, Intrepid Pack, Alpha Two
    miaomiao wrote: »
    This seems...silly.

    Well, yes, it is.

    Sometimes the forums are about discussion on the game, sometimes they are about spreading information on the game, sometimes they are just about entertainment.

    I take pride in the fact that I have provided more entertainment to Stevens playerbase so far than he has.
  • Personaly i'm bad at remembering names- At times i can remember having played with someone before. But not always. Do i care about your "achivement" or your "legacy". No.
    One might have a char they play alone and another they play with a friend.
    In Swtor they have or had (i haven't played the game in some years now). You get a "legency" title. When you unlocked it, you got to name it yourself and you could use it as a sub title. I don't know if others could name it the same. As later you also unlocked new legency titles
    This just seems like such a selfish and actualy stupid idea
    It could be fun to see a pull about this. My guess the vote against it would be in the 90+%
  • ZericZeric Member, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    TeamVASH wrote: »
    Actually I just want my name. Roleplay has been a massive part of my life and my name is what I want. Plain and simple. I don't know what you are on about with this crazy rant. I just want a persistent name. I've wanted it since way before I became a content creator :smile:
    TeamVASH wrote: »
    I don't know why you feel the need to spew toxicity and hate for no reason at all to someone you don't know anything about. That's pretty insane sir but if that's what makes you happy you do you lol

    siiiiiiiigh
    Strawman, Ad hominem, complete avoidance to any points made, and complete dismissal of the people making the points. And no, adding a smiley face doesn't make your post more charming or friendly. It makes you look pretentious. I don't think you could get more pretentious, at this point, even if you actively tried.

    You don't even realize that you own demands are contradictory.
    "Roleplay has been a massive part of my life and my name is what I want."
    "Because I don't want to segregate my accomplishments."
    What you are doing is not ROLEplaying, but ROLLplaying. Everything you have said in this thread, proves it more, and more. You don't want "accomplishments," you want bragging rights. You want to lord your "elitism" over the "peasants." And you want them to know it was VASH that did it.

    I am waiting in, eager anticipation, for you next set of strawmen and ad hominems.
    Good day.
  • TeamVASH wrote: »
    Judous wrote: »

    So you want to master all classes and professions on one character simply for the reputation? It's so silly..

    I make alts because I envision my Tank characters background different from my Clerics. Hardcore players will be just fine, it only affects people who want to be known as the guy who never logs off.

    Why on earth would you care what makes me happy if I'm not hurting anyone? That is a little bit hurtful and very unhelpful to this conversation. My name and reputation matters very much to me in game as in life. It just so happens that I am quite happily obsessive with everything I do and I want a game that allows me endless depth to explore and master. A name matters and I am certainly not the only person that would like to feel acknowledged for their accomplishments. Everyone does whether it be at work, in games, by friends or by family. I feel the drive to be thought well of so be it success or failure it is drives me to keep growing as a person and always do my best the best that I can be and to be known as a good person.

    If you want to make an alt then by all means alt to your hearts content. I accept and embrace your vision for your characters. Please do me the same courtesy <3

    that hypocritical and narrowminded, you ARE hurting altoholics with this system. i dont want my tank to look skinny like my mage or my amge to look bulky like my tank. in addition to that theres enough people that hate looking at the same character all the time so they use alts even for the same class simply for variation of onscreen pixels. also your system would make specialising in classes useless regardless of skill, the whole playerbase would just be a blur of classes with no distinction. players would be asked to pick certain classes for certain types of content and they would be told how to skill slot/spend and what mindless rotations to use.

    A BIG NO!! from me, however i dont think it would hurt if they make you pick a last name for all your characters so youre still recognisable. but what you want is completely drastically change the way this game and an mmo works to suit your own hardcore needs. this isnt a shooter where you just switch classes in a second with barely any investment or knowledge.

  • I understand what you're saying, but no. Nor do I want some universal identifier like a "family" name, such as in BDO.
  • ShoelidShoelid Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    There have been several posts like this, and I think they're all a little bit selfish. There's inherent friction that comes from alts. Some people like it and others like OP have zero tolerance for it. Sometimes that friction can be lessened through things like a surname system that links all of your characters together.

    But I think forcing people to commit to a decision from minute zero makes that decision a lot more important. The decision of class forms much of your character, and I shouldn't have the ability to change it on a whim.

    I always hate to bring in WoW anecdotes but the game and community is massive so it's hard not to-- WoW has very little connection between alts, and you cannot switch your class at a whim. You can see the effect of this in its creator community, which you seem to be very concerned about. When you think about Asmongold and WoW, you think about how diehard he is for his warrior. McConnelRet's entire brand is Retribution Paladin, as is Esfand's. Venruki is a mage, and Reckful was insane with his rogue. For me-- I'll always be a rogue and I take a good amount of pride in my fluency with every random ability that they have.

    That amount of diehard class loyalty and consistency is more valuable for the game's fun and longevity than some vague notion of completionism or username consistency will ever be.

  • I do agree with you that, Name is very important in MMO.

    But wouldn't the better solution to this would be that an account can have multiple characters with same name. That a name is not unique to a character but an account. That way you want to play another class? Login from your alt which has the same NAME!!!
    "Suffer in silence"
  • Sylvanar wrote: »
    I do agree with you that, Name is very important in MMO.

    But wouldn't the better solution to this would be that an account can have multiple characters with same name. That a name is not unique to a character but an account. That way you want to play another class? Login from your alt which has the same NAME!!!

    How would you differentiate my character named Sylvanar with your character, Sylvanar? Any other form of account bound identifier promotes meta-bullying which isn't something I think people would appreciate.
  • SylvanarSylvanar Member
    edited September 2020
    Merek wrote: »
    Sylvanar wrote: »
    I do agree with you that, Name is very important in MMO.

    But wouldn't the better solution to this would be that an account can have multiple characters with same name. That a name is not unique to a character but an account. That way you want to play another class? Login from your alt which has the same NAME!!!

    How would you differentiate my character named Sylvanar with your character, Sylvanar? Any other form of account bound identifier promotes meta-bullying which isn't something I think people would appreciate.

    Names would be "Account bound". I have my 'Sylvanar' rogue lets say and I make a mage in the same account then I should be able to name that mage as 'Sylvanar' too. As the name would be account bound to my account, you wont be able to use this name. Ofc I would have to do everything in the mage character starting from level 1. I dunno what meta-bullying is.
    "Suffer in silence"
Sign In or Register to comment.