Greetings, glorious testers!
Check out Alpha Two Announcements here to see the latest news on Alpha Two.
Check out general Announcements here to see the latest news on Ashes of Creation & Intrepid Studios.
To get the quickest updates regarding Alpha Two, connect your Discord and Intrepid accounts here.
Check out Alpha Two Announcements here to see the latest news on Alpha Two.
Check out general Announcements here to see the latest news on Ashes of Creation & Intrepid Studios.
To get the quickest updates regarding Alpha Two, connect your Discord and Intrepid accounts here.
Comments
Different strats, different counter plays, different range of knowledge of your opponent's style of play, different class matchups - all played a huge roll exactly because you couldn't just wipe your enemy in a few abilities.
It's really interesting to see people complain about "boring long fights". I really feel like it simply comes from a place of shitty combat design, rather than long ttk.
This was one of the most OP classes in the game at the time and this is the top player of that class (in top OEd gear and with great skill), against people of several different progress lvls (only a few near to the MC), and even then ttk is somewhere around 6-7s
And this was during the times when mages/archers could 1-2crit you in a party situation, let alone any assist-kills by a party. If Ashes has even deeper/better combat - I'd definitely want an at least slightly longer ttk.
And attackers would just hide a bit further away from the path, while having either an alt or a friend tracking the caravan's movements.
What I'm trying to say is that the jump shown in the stream wasn't all that difficult to set up and would've been somewhat difficult to repel, especially considering that proper attackers wouldn't be as conspicuous as Steven's group was.
To me this just sounds like a bad combat design. Either a low amount of abilities and counters to them or a low variety of general counterplay available to players at any given time.
The problem, no matter the design, is endless repetition. If you have a 30 second full rotation, thats what you will do each time. It would actually hurt you to do anything different.
With a shorter engagement you have to make decisions about what to use and how hard to push on any specific target.
With engagements of a long enough time scale, nothing ever changes and no decisions need to be made.
If we do - yes, you will be correct and it'll all be dumb boring rotations.
As a couple people have said though, this whole discussion does hinge on how we measure it.
Someone (?) said multiple attackers combining to bring you down in 1sec = 1sec TTK which is obviously ludicrous.
TTK is generally assuming 1v1, then adjusted by all sorts of variables.
Of course every class will have a variety of ways to mitigate/heal/escape/cc etc, and if you don't use them (or are completely outskilled) then yes I think dying in 10-15 secs Vs a top dmg dealing class is reasonable.
Aside, I do however agree the 6sec mob TTK seems too low.
It felt that way in all of the MMOs I've played that had super long engagements. When you have time to hit all of the buttons, there is not much left to do but hit them all again. You will eventually figure out the most effective order.
My guess is, if things are to short at 10 to 15, it will get upped to 15 to 20.
It's a specific style thing, I think MMO players who don't also play fighters just don't have the concepts (related to player preferences) thrown at them as quickly.
You should probably get off the copium and start looking for a diff game though, NiKr. We hear the word 'rotation' used often enough now that I feel that we'd be completely foolish to assume we were getting what you're talking about.
A shorter TTK is just another strong datapoint for the Modern design type.
But as that video shows, I'm already used to shorter ttk, so as long as core designs don't change (mainly being pvp, nodes, wars) - Ashes will still be for me. My standards are super low, even if my desires and preferences are much higher.
If Ashes ends up being completely not my thing - I'll still have Mihoyo games and all the other hundreds of games in my Steam account. I'll simply know for sure that mmos are no longer for me.
Not sure there’s enough time for a rotation.
This raises another potential concern: that a shorter overall TTK means no need for set up skills, building attacks, and synergies. It could be an indicator that combat is not going to be very layered at all, but more of the slashy-slashy-stab-sparkle we’ve seen in 2023 projects.
Still thinking this will be worked out in A2, but it’s a concern nonetheless.
It depends on your perception/definition of it, which is a debate Fighting Game players have been having for 20 years.
Glad to see the MMO space 'catching up to the same issue' with its latest attempts at making competitive play feel good... /s
But I wouldn't say it doesn't require them, it might require them too much. The precision and awareness required for doing a lot of team-combo stuff people do now is quite high, but technically, a high precision skill ceiling with really tight timing isn't a non-option, design wise.
I'm sure it will still be your thing and you will adapt, just expect there are going to be some elements of modern in the combat. Though the design will have old school elements, item drops, PvP, less fast travel, etc.
Granted its alpha so its a ever changing beast.
Wednesday's at PM Cst
https://www.youtube.com/@TheHiddenDaggerInn/featured
I'd just prefer something deeper and more complex on the skill design part, and imo longer ttk supports that way better. Like, I do not see weapon procs mattering at all, nor synergies, nor combos.
And god forbid the tab part of targeting has a "/target PlayerX" function. That would utterly destroy any ttk design or combat balancing.
The thing is, you absolutely could get both.
The question is if the niche that enjoys this type of MMO's design also enjoys that type of physical execution requirements.
I really thought the answer to that was 'no' based on things people have said over the years (combined with a few other things said by the people who do like it).
But maybe the whole thing is banking on the silent majority at this point.
I'm sure everyone is going to matter, though im going based on my vibe on what I've been hearing so far with customization on AoC, and the devs ideas on guild effects.
But we will see how things turn out 6 months from now when we are deep in the alpha 2.
So maybe this is just yet another contradiction in the design, or maybe I'm just totally mistaken in my assumptions and observations.
ttk in old school mmorpg was really low in pvp
But that is down to two people knowing their class well, and using everything at their disposal to mitigate/cc/heal etc. 10sec TTK is absolute base, and doesn't rule these type of fights out at all, IMO.
thats why you apply healing reductions
A party physically cannot have 10 dpsers to use their powerful abilities to one-shot a person.
Or are you on Depraved's side of this and are talking about "a damn raid is targeting a single person"? Cause I don't think anyone here denies that possibility.
Again though the 6 sec TTK when soloing mobs does seem a bit quick.
The skills you choose to use should change depending on the specific encounter.
Ideally, most combat will not be about "solo" rotations.
We should have time to assess what our groupmates are doing during the battle and determine how we can best synergize our abilities.
Our Mage just hit a Chilled target with Frostbolt - which means my Ranger can try to stack that CC with a Nature-based Root - which gives the Spellsword time to position for an Ice-Augmented Leap Strike.
Rather than just having the Mage mash their "rotations" as quickly as the Cooldowns will allow.