Noaani wrote: » Mag7spy wrote: » Otr wrote: » NiKr wrote: » Hinotori wrote: » I thought most of us didn't want that. Most of us still don't. So far it's mostly only Dygz and Mag that are vehemently fighting to get chores in the game. Though they're fighting for that for different reasons They both want to destroy the game. Destroy the game lol? Its called being realistic as there is a market place and they clearly need to make lot of mooney to both support the devs and be able to grow the IP. I'm curious. If you think this will make more money for Intrepid, where is that money coming from? It has to be one of three places. Either more players are buying the same cosmetic via battlepass than would buy it via a store, the same number of people are paying more for that same cosmetic, or battlepass is causing people to stay subscribed longer than they otherwise would. Which of these three do you believe would happen? There is no fourth option, by the way. Other options simply don't fit in with your desire to be realistic, as your above post states.
Mag7spy wrote: » Otr wrote: » NiKr wrote: » Hinotori wrote: » I thought most of us didn't want that. Most of us still don't. So far it's mostly only Dygz and Mag that are vehemently fighting to get chores in the game. Though they're fighting for that for different reasons They both want to destroy the game. Destroy the game lol? Its called being realistic as there is a market place and they clearly need to make lot of mooney to both support the devs and be able to grow the IP.
Otr wrote: » NiKr wrote: » Hinotori wrote: » I thought most of us didn't want that. Most of us still don't. So far it's mostly only Dygz and Mag that are vehemently fighting to get chores in the game. Though they're fighting for that for different reasons They both want to destroy the game.
NiKr wrote: » Hinotori wrote: » I thought most of us didn't want that. Most of us still don't. So far it's mostly only Dygz and Mag that are vehemently fighting to get chores in the game. Though they're fighting for that for different reasons
Hinotori wrote: » I thought most of us didn't want that.
NiKr wrote: » Here's a calculator for the current season. And according to this Fortnite does have dailies and it's quite beneficial to do them as well.https://www.fortnitexp.net/index.html If you get around 200k xp per day (weeklies included) - that's around 40 days of daily playing and doing correct actions to get the max lvl. I got no clue how much xp you can get from milestone stuff daily and if that's grindable or not, so it's difficult to say what kind of daily XP ceiling there is. This still directly aligns with my grievances with the system. You gotta do certain dailies, certain weeklies, certain tasks - all in hopes that there isn't an upper limit on XP gain per day/week and in hopes that all those activities are even marginally interesting to you and/or align with all your other plans for your gameplay sessions.
Liniker wrote: » I just think its insane for a game with a mandatory monthly sub to charge extra for a battlepass, this would be one of the worst shit shows ever, worse than the Battle Royale was, the large audience would bash the game, AoC would be a bigger meme than Diablo Imortal was, from a battle royale, to a 250$ alpha, to a monthly sub game with battlepass... whats next a VIP system on top of that? jesus.. at least its not on Steam for the overwhelmingly negative reviews... Hopefully intrepid is self aware and learned their lesson
Mag7spy wrote: » You are stuck in trying to say a BP tells you what to do when we keep saying a battlepass does not. So we are going to keep going in circles because you are refusing to listen and trying to argue something we are not talking about. You do not need to do dailies or weeklies to get XP and finish it (you can play the game as you always have). If you are trying to min max and finish it extremely fast than that is on you and doesn't even mean it will really finish extremely fast.
bloodprophet wrote: » Ya I find it very sketchy. I would think if it was a good thing and you were proud of it you would just provide a list for your customers of what they can expect this season on the BP.
bloodprophet wrote: » The point on spending money to then play 100 hours and still not get what you paid for is super sketchy. In a F2P game I get you're trying to make money but at a minimum be honest with your customers.
bloodprophet wrote: » The companies keep doing this because people reward them for it. Is like most of what ails global society. If we keep rewarding this poor behavior it will continue.
bloodprophet wrote: » This guy has a more balanced view on the passes but said what I said at the end. We need to expect better.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8wM-TVIqSA
NiKr wrote: » Mag7spy wrote: » You are stuck in trying to say a BP tells you what to do when we keep saying a battlepass does not. So we are going to keep going in circles because you are refusing to listen and trying to argue something we are not talking about. You do not need to do dailies or weeklies to get XP and finish it (you can play the game as you always have). If you are trying to min max and finish it extremely fast than that is on you and doesn't even mean it will really finish extremely fast. I already addressed this in a previous post, so reiterating it would be pointless, cause it was obviously ignored. I also use Fortnite as an example because Dygz brings it up constantly as one. Dygz said that modern BPs don't have dailies/weeklies/whateverlies, but they not only apparently do, but are also beneficial (and optimal) to complete, cause they give a ton of xp. I also literally said, I don't know how much XP the milestones do (the "do whatever and get xp" tasks that you both keep bringing up), so if Dygz can give an example of how much XP he gets from them per daily session of doing his own thing - that'd be great. And if you have a visual/written examples of the BPs you mention - you're free and welcomed to provide them.
Dygz wrote: » bloodprophet wrote: » This guy has a more balanced view on the passes but said what I said at the end. We need to expect better.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8wM-TVIqSA Um. Why would you be expecting this one to be much better than the first one when it starts with - "That was a great Battlepass... said no one EVER!" ???? That's not a balanced view - and... of course it's going to say what you said in the end. Garbage in/Garbage out
Mag7spy wrote: » So now you are stuck on this fortnite battle pass and weekly thing like they give the most XP. Ignoring the fact a mmorpg and a battle royal are different with their needs of xp. Its pretty obvious a battle passes work different game to game in progression. But you are only looking for select point to fuel you trying to convince yourself you are right.
Mag7spy wrote: » XP growth and progression are irrelevant to this disccusion because its about monetization. If you want to have one about battle pass and how it should be for AoC that is a different story. But you aren't using this as a disccusion as a echo chamber in your head to reinforcements you not liking them. How a battle pass works should be kept separate from the fact should a game have a battle pass, it is two different discussions.
NiKr wrote: » Mag7spy wrote: » So now you are stuck on this fortnite battle pass and weekly thing like they give the most XP. Ignoring the fact a mmorpg and a battle royal are different with their needs of xp. Its pretty obvious a battle passes work different game to game in progression. But you are only looking for select point to fuel you trying to convince yourself you are right. This is an argument against Dygz bringing up Fortnite as a good example of BPs, so I won't respond to that. Mag7spy wrote: » XP growth and progression are irrelevant to this disccusion because its about monetization. If you want to have one about battle pass and how it should be for AoC that is a different story. But you aren't using this as a disccusion as a echo chamber in your head to reinforcements you not liking them. How a battle pass works should be kept separate from the fact should a game have a battle pass, it is two different discussions. I've been talking to both you and Dygz separately, addressing your points separately. But both of you keep fucking going into each other's lanes and saying that my arguments against the other person doesn't apply to your separate issues, when I specifically try to respond to both of you separately. I already told you. I believe that a properly balanced direct sale of cosmetics would bring Intrepid more money and would also make them seem less corporate. If a premium BP has 10 cosmetics and costs $10 that means those cosmetics are valued at $1 each by Intrepid, so they should just sell them for $1 directly and be done with it. I'll gladly buy 5 that I want, instead of paying Intrepid for making me play the game for 100h just to get a single cosmetic at the end of the BP weeks after I've paid for it. Dygz keeps bringing up an apples&oranges comparison of "APOC had a BP, so the mmo will most likely have one as well" and adds that previous cosmetics have already established a cost ladder for all the future cosmetics. But this would then go directly against the existence of any kind of BP that costs $10, but has more than two small cosmetics that would've previously costed $5 each. In other words if Intrepid did implement a BP - they'd either put the SHITTIEST cosmetics in it, because their inherent cost is waaaay below any other directly sold one, or if they weren't the shittiest it would mean that all the previous cosmetics were overpriced as fuck, so Intrepid were almost scamming people out of their money. Hell, iirc APOC BP cosmetics were supposedly meant to get transferred into the mmo, right? And I'd assume the BP had several cosmetics, while costing $10. Oh, I looked it up. It was 50 FUCKING COSMETICS, even for Beta2 pre-orderers, which means that Intrepid valued those at $1.5 per cosmetic.https://ashesofcreation.wiki/Ashes_of_Creation_Apocalypse_adventure_paths In other words, they have already established the price point that I was talking about. This means that Intrepid could freely sell their cosmetics directly to the player at pretty much any cost, which would be a much better approach than making people wait for weeks just to get what they want.
bloodprophet wrote: » [ 10 minutes to watch a 20 minute video pretty amazing. Thank you for agreeing with us. garbage in gets garbage out.
NiKr wrote: » [ I already told you. I believe that a properly balanced direct sale of cosmetics would bring Intrepid more money and would also make them seem less corporate. If a premium BP has 10 cosmetics and costs $10 that means those cosmetics are valued at $1 each by Intrepid, so they should just sell them for $1 directly and be done with it. I'll gladly buy 5 that I want, instead of paying Intrepid for making me play the game for 100h just to get a single cosmetic at the end of the BP weeks after I've paid for it.
Dygz wrote: » NiKr wrote: » [ I already told you. I believe that a properly balanced direct sale of cosmetics would bring Intrepid more money and would also make them seem less corporate. If a premium BP has 10 cosmetics and costs $10 that means those cosmetics are valued at $1 each by Intrepid, so they should just sell them for $1 directly and be done with it. I'll gladly buy 5 that I want, instead of paying Intrepid for making me play the game for 100h just to get a single cosmetic at the end of the BP weeks after I've paid for it. I gtta run to dance class, but again this claim is false. Because the pricing for Cosmetics came from the Cash Shop years before the Battlepass existed. The Battlepass is a discount for similar items already priced years earlier in the Cash Shop. They didn't generate the pricing by looking at the Battlepass first. Battlepasses don't "make you play the game".